Security fixes:
- IP validation: bounds checking for octets (0-255)
- ETH.config() return value now checked with distinct logging
- set ip 0.0.0.0 now enables DHCP (was rejected before)
Documentation:
- Fixed typo: 'thevalue' → 'the value'
- Added missing: advert.zerohop command documentation
- Clarified IP configuration behavior (DHCP, ETH_STATIC_IP fallback, reset to DHCP)
All identified issues addressed or documented as out-of-scope.
PR #2260 ready for maintainer review.
* room server: added RegionMap, and new CommonCLI wiring, default_scope handling
* sensor: only minimal RegionMap wiring. Still needs work to handle default-scope
Instead of overloading getOutboundCount() with a magic sentinel value,
add a dedicated getOutboundTotal() method to the PacketManager interface
that returns the total queue size without time filtering.
This eliminates the fragile convention that caused the regression and
makes the two operations — time-filtered count vs total count —
explicitly separate in the API.
This change addresses two issues. The first is that the
LilyGo_TLora_V2_1_1_6_terminal_chat build would try to compile
simple_repeater/MyMesh.cpp. All other examples of terminal chat
targets are instead building simple_secure_chat/main.cpp . This
change would align this build to the rest of the builds.
The second issue, found during the course of investigating the
first, stems from simple_repeater/MyMesh.cpp using the
MAX_NEIGHBOURS #define to control whether the neighbor list is kept.
Repeaters that keep this list must define this value, and if the
value is not defined, then all neighbor-related functionality is
compiled out. However, the code that replies to
REQ_TYPE_GET_NEIGHBOURS did not properly check for this #define,
and thus any target that compiles simple_repeater/MyMesh.cpp
without defining MAX_NEIGHBOURS would get an undefined variable
compilation error.
As a practical matter though, there are no targets that compile
simple_repeater/MyMesh.cpp AND do not define MAX_NEIGHBOURS,
except this build due to the first issue. As a result, the
second issue is addressed only as a matter of completeness. The
expected behavior with this change is that such a repeater would
send a valid reply indicating zero known neighbors.
