Merge pull request #1169 from Meshcore-Portugal/jbrazio/2025_db83f76e

Bridge: Fix RAK4631 GPS conflict and add T114 RS232 targets
This commit is contained in:
ripplebiz 2025-12-03 13:43:19 +11:00 committed by GitHub
commit c77391c5dd
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
4 changed files with 43 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -15,10 +15,9 @@ void RS232Bridge::begin() {
#if defined(ESP32)
((HardwareSerial *)_serial)->setPins(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_RX, WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_TX);
#elif defined(RAK_4631)
((Uart *)_serial)->setPins(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_RX, WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_TX);
#elif defined(NRF52_PLATFORM)
((HardwareSerial *)_serial)->setPins(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_RX, WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_TX);
// Tested with RAK_4631 and T114
((Uart *)_serial)->setPins(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_RX, WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_TX);
#elif defined(RP2040_PLATFORM)
((SerialUART *)_serial)->setRX(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_RX);
((SerialUART *)_serial)->setTX(WITH_RS232_BRIDGE_TX);
@ -123,8 +122,7 @@ void RS232Bridge::sendPacket(mesh::Packet *packet) {
// Check if packet fits within our maximum payload size
if (len > (MAX_TRANS_UNIT + 1)) {
BRIDGE_DEBUG_PRINTLN("TX packet too large (payload=%d, max=%d)\n", len,
MAX_TRANS_UNIT + 1);
BRIDGE_DEBUG_PRINTLN("TX packet too large (payload=%d, max=%d)\n", len, MAX_TRANS_UNIT + 1);
return;
}

View file

@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
* Platform Support:
* Different platforms require different pin configuration methods:
* - ESP32: Uses HardwareSerial::setPins(rx, tx)
* - NRF52: Uses HardwareSerial::setPins(rx, tx)
* - NRF52: Uses Uart::setPins(rx, tx)
* - RP2040: Uses SerialUART::setRX(rx) and SerialUART::setTX(tx)
* - STM32: Uses HardwareSerial::setRx(rx) and HardwareSerial::setTx(tx)
*/