eoli3n/archiso-zfs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/eoli3n/archiso-zfs.git synced 2026-03-17 16:54:38 +01:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix text

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
eoli3n 2020-05-01 17:37:33 +02:00
parent 853bf80da7
commit 861f85ff96
1 changed files with 5 additions and 9 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
README.md
View file

@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
### Why this
If you want to install Archlinux on ZFS, you need to deal with [ZFS licensing problem](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ZFS). Kernel module isn't included in default archiso, you need to [include it](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ZFS#Embed_the_archzfs_packages_into_an_archiso) in a custom archiso to be able to install ZFS.
If you want to install Archlinux on ZFS, you need to deal with [ZFS licensing problem](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ZFS). The kernel module isn't included in default archiso, you need to [include it](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ZFS#Embed_the_archzfs_packages_into_an_archiso) in a custom archiso to be able to install ZFS.
I wrote an article about [archiso netbooting](https://eoli3n.github.io/archlinux/2020/04/25/recovery.html).
This project let you include zfs kernel module on any archiso without creating a custom one.
This project lets you include the zfs kernel module on any archiso without creating a custom one.
### Archzfs
Archzfs unofficial user repository allows one to install ZFS kernel module in multiple ways.
The Archzfs unofficial user repository allows one to install the ZFS kernel module in multiple ways.
We will compile current kernel zfs module using DKMS method.
DKMS needs ``linux-headers`` of the currently booted system to be able to build the module.
@ -21,13 +21,9 @@ Boot on any archiso, and use
```
curl -s https://eoli3n.github.io/archzfs/init | bash
```
This is a mirror with an easier url. Instead you can use a more hacky way
```
```
### Wow, that's slow...
Yes, Arch Linux Archive have a limited brandwidth, but at least, it is automated.
A better solution would be to store archives on Archzfs repo.
Yes, the Arch Linux Archive have a limited brandwidth, but at least, it is automated.
A better solution would be to store archives on the Archzfs repo.
More details here : https://github.com/archzfs/archzfs/issues/337